Beer Study Buddy
← Back to syllabus topics

BJCP Beer Judge Entrance Exam · Judging Procedure and Scoresheets

Descriptive Sensory Writing

Syllabus Path

Useful descriptions identify the attribute, its quality, its intensity, and often where it appears in the sip.

  1. 2. Judging Procedure and Scoresheets
  2. H. Descriptive Sensory Writing

Exam Focus

  • Write sensory notes that name attribute quality, intensity, and timing rather than relying on category labels such as 'malty.'
  • Keep aroma, taste, mouthfeel, and aftertaste observations distinct enough to avoid double-counting.
  • Describe absent character only when its absence affects style fit, balance, or diagnosis.

Core concept

Replace bare labels such as “malty” with specific evidence such as low toasted bread crust, moderate caramel, or high roast. Address absence only when it matters to the style or diagnosis.

Judging and study application

Use neutral language and keep observations orthogonal. A specific description helps the entrant understand the score even when the judge cannot determine the production cause.

Why It Matters

  • Specific evidence lets an entrant understand a score even when the judge cannot identify a production cause.
  • Vague labels prevent panelists from discovering whether they agree on the actual character or only on a broad word.

Practical Sensory Exercises

Expand five vague descriptors

Replace 'malty,' 'hoppy,' 'fruity,' 'thin,' and 'off' with notes that state intensity and a concrete quality. Add where each character appears: initial aroma, mid-palate, finish, or aftertaste.

Key Terms

Intensity
The perceived strength of an attribute.
Descriptor
A word or phrase naming sensory quality.
Orthogonal description
Separate observations that avoid double-counting one sensation.

References

2 available